Thesis

Investigation and Development of Architectural Process through the Adaptive Reuse of "Big Box" Architecture.

Abstract
Through the exploration of adaptive reuse of residual, no longer viable, commercial buildings in economically challenged urban zones develop an over arching guide and process upon which to base future architectural practice, solidifying design principles that have the potential to define specific approaches to architectural strategies and form making. The adaptive reuse of architecture, specifically "big box" architecture, in a form that captures and utilizes natural daylight, artificial light, and inspires the human spirit addresses many key issues prevalent in today’s practice and design discourses. The notions that the proper lighting of space effects its occupants is not new, but one that is very seldom maximized in the built environment that we occupy. In addition, the importance of recycling building products and materials is at a peak in the world today. The building industry is one of the largest contributors to the degradation of our planet. Adaptive reuse of buildings is quite simply the recycling of architecture.



fracture of rigid form
thin outlines of light
natural and artificial
of worlds on a journey
who grin at the day
to the evening breeze

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

other works: matta-clark process, wilson in motion

Here are some links to some film by Matta-Clark documenting the actual installation of this work from Ubuweb.

Splitting, Bingo/Ninth, 1974-76
http://www.ubu.com/film/gmc_splitting.html

Conical Intersection, 1975
http://www.ubu.com/film/gmc_conical.html

Day's End, 1975
http://www.ubu.com/film/gmc_daysend.html

City Slivers, 1976
http://www.ubu.com/film/gmc_slivers.html


Here is the Liverpool project by Richard Wilson in motion - "Turning the Place Over"
Exterior
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qh2esOoI1Y
Interior
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4ogYjx_GFw&feature=related

1 comment:

F.R. said...

Wow interesting video. The old video bit creepy looking..
reading the comments the people leave in u-tube, it is a thin from people perception between a piece of Art or piece of S***. I think because the arguments it is safe to say is an art.